Unit 01 · Passage 1
What a street tree is actually doing
The row of trees along a city street looks like decoration, but it is doing measurable work. A mature plane tree moves several hundred litres of water out of the ground on a hot day, carrying heat away with it. That water is released as vapour, and the street around the tree cools by two or three degrees. Shade matters as well, though it matters less than most people assume. A bare pavement in July can reach sixty degrees, and every surface near it holds that heat until long after dark. The tree does not remove the heat; it moves the heat somewhere the city does not feel it. The value of these effects are hard to see because nobody pays for them directly. A city that measures them carefully finds that one street tree returns several times what it cost to plant. Most cities never measure, so the tree stays on the wrong side of the ledger and is the first thing cut when a budget tightens.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 01 · Passage 2
A pavement built to drink instead of to shed
The pavements of most cities were laid to shed water as fast as possible. Rain hits concrete, runs to a drain and leaves the city inside an hour. This works until the hour when more rain arrives than the drains were built for. Porous paving, which lets water pass straight through it, behaves differently. Water entering the surface spreads sideways into a bed of stone underneath, soaking away over the following days. The street stops acting like a roof and starts acting like soil. The stone bed holds the water for days, and plants along the kerb reach it without anybody turning on a tap. A trial street in Portland absorbed rain so quick that the drains below it never filled. The same surface has kept the street cooler in summer, because wet stone loses heat as it dries. Neither result was the reason the street was rebuilt; both were noticed afterwards and are now written into the city's design rules. A surface that was chosen to stop a flood has ended up doing three jobs at once.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 02 · Passage 1
Why distance decides whether a bottle is worth recycling
A glass bottle put into a recycling bin is collected, crushed and melted into a bottle almost exactly like it. The material loses almost nothing in the process, which is why glass can go round the loop many times. Melting glass, however, demands a furnace running at fifteen hundred degrees. The furnace is the whole argument. A bottle that travels two hundred kilometres to reach it has already spent more energy than the melting will save. Several cities discovered this after their nearest glass plant closed, and the collected bottles were remained in storage for months. Some of them were crushed for road stone in the end, which is a use, though not the one printed on the bin. None of this makes recycling pointless. It makes distance part of the calculation, a fact that the word recycling quietly hides. A city with a plant nearby and a city without one are doing two different things while using the same green bin.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 02 · Passage 2
What the word donated leaves out
Clothes handed in at a charity shop are sorted within days. What can be sold locally stays; the rest is baled and sold abroad by weight. The bale is bought unseen, so its buyer is paying for an average, not for a garment. For thirty years that trade worked because the average was good enough to resell. Then clothing became cheap enough to treat as disposable, and the average fell. Traders in Accra now open bales in which four garments in ten cannot be sold at any price. Those garments are not returning to anybody; they are burned, buried, or left on the shore. The word donated does a great deal of work in this story. It carries the warmth of the giving and none of the weight of the shore, and both belong to the same act. It describes what the giver intended, not what happening to the cloth afterwards. A system judged by the first step will always look better than the same system judged by the last.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 03 · Passage 1
What a star's name is a fact about
Most of the stars you can see have no names at all, which surprises people. About three hundred carry old Arabic or Greek words that sailors and farmers gave them. The rest are catalogue numbers, and astronomers use them without complaint. Naming is not a scientific act, and astronomers say so themselves. A name tells you nothing about the mass or the age or the distance of the object. It tells you what a group of people once thought was worth pointing at. That is a fact about the namers, not about the sky. In 2019 the union that governs such things invited every country to name one star. The names what arrived came from languages that had never been written into the sky before. A star whose catalogue number ran to eleven digits is now called by a word in Chamorro. Nothing about the star has changed; everything about who may point at it has.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 03 · Passage 2
Who was looking when the southern sky was drawn
The northern sky was mapped first because the people with instruments lived under it. Ptolemy's catalogue stops at a line in the sky below which he had never looked. The gap sat there for fourteen centuries and nobody treated it as a gap. Sailors crossing the equator were the first to face those stars in numbers. They needed a southern pole star and found that the sky had not provided one. A Dutch expedition returned in 1597 with a chart where twelve new figures filled the empty region. None of them came from myth; they were a fish, a fly, a compass and a peacock. The men on that ship had spent their lives among instruments, and the instruments went up with them. The navigators had put them into the sky without ever saying so. The southern sky is therefore the only half of the sky that carries a signature. Every name up there is a record of who was looking, which is the only thing a name can ever be.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 04 · Passage 1
Why a slower tool remembers more
Students who take notes by hand write more slowly than students who type. They also record carefully fewer words, which sounds like a straightforward disadvantage. Tested a week later, they remember more of what was said. A keyboard lets a listener move as quickly as a speaker, so nothing has to be decided. The sentence arrives, and the fingers pass it on unread. A pen is more faster to fall behind, and falling behind forces a choice. The writer must decide what the speaker meant before the hand can move at all. That decision is the whole of the effect. A student who cannot keep up has to ask which half of the sentence carries the meaning, and asking is remembering. Note-taking by hand is not about writing; it is about hearing, sorting and reading a sentence twice. Typing removes that question entirely, and a question nobody asks leaves nothing behind in the person who did not ask it. A slower tool made the work more difficult, and the difficulty was the point.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 04 · Passage 2
What went out of the room with the stenographer
For a century every court and every parliament employed people who could write steadily faster than anybody could speak. Shorthand replaced each common sound with a stroke, and a trained hand kept pace with a speech. The skill took two years to learn and paid better than most office work. Recording machines ended the trade within about fifteen years. A machine could capture every word and to record it without training. What disappeared with the stenographers was not the words. It was the summary that a stenographer made while writing, because shorthand forces the same choice a pen forces. Nobody decided to give that up; the summary simply had nowhere left to be made. A recording gives back an hour and asks for an hour to listen to it again. Very few institutions now have anybody who can say what a meeting decided without replaying it. The most complete record is not the most useful one, and the two are easy to confuse.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 05 · Passage 1
What a noisy ward costs a body
A hospital ward at night is rarely quiet. Monitors beep, doors close and trolleys pass, and the average night on a general ward reaches the volume of a busy road. Staff stop hearing it within a week; patients never do. Nobody chose the noise, and for a long time nobody counted it either. Sleep that is interrupted five or six times an hour is not simply short sleep. It is sleep that never reaches the deep stage in which the body repairs tissue. Two wards in the same building were compared for a year. On the noisier ward wounds took two days longer to close and patients asked for more pain relief. Noise, in other words, improved recovery, and nobody had written it into a chart. The cheapest fix was not a rebuild. It was felt bumpers on bin lids, rubber wheels on trolleys and a rule about voices after ten. The quieter ward cost eleven thousand pounds and sent people home sooner than the ward beside it.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 05 · Passage 2
Why a monitor that never stops stops meaning anything
Every alarm in an intensive care unit was designed by somebody who assumed it would be rare. Put two hundred such devices in one room and the average patient generates about a hundred alarms a shift. Ninety-five of every hundred are ignored, and they should be. Most are triggered by a patient turning over or by a sensor slipping off a finger. One hospital rewrote its thresholds so that fewer alarms sounded at all. The number of alarms fell by nine tenths within a month. Nurses then reached the bedside sooner than before, because an alarm had started meaning something again. Not one of the alarms that had been switched off turned out to matter, and the ward kept a written record to prove it. The point here is not about volume. A warning that fires constantly carries more information than one that fires rarely, and the ear learns that within days. The safest monitor is the one a person still believes, and belief is spent every time it is wrong.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 06 · Passage 1
The island that stayed on the chart because nobody sailed there
For more than a century an uninhabited island sat in the Coral Sea on every serious chart. It had a shape, a length of about twenty-five kilometres and a name. Ships were routed around it and satellite maps drew a grey shadow where it should have been. Nobody had ever landed on it, which nobody thought strange. In 2012 an Australian research ship crossed that square of ocean on its way somewhere else. The crew watched the depth reading and confirmed fourteen hundred metres of open water under the hull. There was no island and there had never been one. A single nineteenth-century whaler had reported it, and every chart after that had copied the report rather than the sea. The island was discovered from the world's charts within a year. What the story shows is not that old maps were unreliable. It is that a misplaced line survives for exactly as long as nobody sails across it. Copying is cheaper than checking, and a chart cannot tell you which of its lines were ever checked.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 06 · Passage 2
A number that was reprinted fifty-seven times
A tide table for a small port was printed with one inaccurate figure in 1904. The high-water time for one day of the year was out by forty minutes. The error was copied into the following year's table and into every edition after that. Each printing looked like independent confirmation of the last. In 1961 a harbour master disproved the figure by standing on the quay with a watch. He wrote to the publisher and received a polite letter saying the tables were compiled from long records. The long records were the earlier tables. Nothing about the sea had been measured twice; the number had simply been reprinted fifty-seven times. Repetition shortened the authority of the figure until it looked like a fact about the tide. A number that has been printed many times feels checked, and feeling checked is not the same as being checked. The uncorrected line was finally withdrawn in 1968, sixty-four years after somebody first got it wrong.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 07 · Passage 1
Why foresters started carrying seed uphill
A forest cannot walk, but the climate it grew up in is moving north at about four kilometres a year. Seeds travel a few hundred metres in a good year, carried by wind or by a bird that forgot where it buried them. The arithmetic is not close. Trees that took ten thousand years to reach a valley now have decades to leave it. Foresters in British Columbia therefore began to carry seed uphill and northward themselves. The principal objection was not scientific. It was that moving a species deliberately breaks a rule people hold about wild places, which is that nobody arranges them. The rule is recent, and the forests it protects are not wild in the way the word suggests. A seedling from four hundred kilometres south is already adopted to the summers this valley will have in 2060. Planted now, it grows slowly for a decade and then overtakes the local stock. Planted in 2060, it arrives after the fire that removed the forest. The choice is not between interference and leaving things alone; it is between two kinds of interference, one of them slower. Doing nothing also affects the valley, and it does so without anybody signing for it.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 07 · Passage 2
The seed that is safest is the one still growing
A seed bank looks like the safest form of storage and is the least useful one. Seeds kept at minus twenty degrees stop changing, which is exactly the problem. The world outside the freezer does not stop. A wheat variety frozen in 1975 meets a fungus in 2030 that did not exist when the door closed. A field collection is the opposite arrangement. The same wheat is grown out every few years, and each generation meets whatever the weather and the pests are doing. Some of it dies, which looks like a loss and is a measurement. The survivors carry the answer to a question nobody had thought to ask. Freezing preserves the past principle of a crop and nothing else. Growing preserves the ability to keep answering, which is a different kind of safety. The two collections are not rivals; the frozen one is insurance and the living one is the crop.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 08 · Passage 1
The information an English sentence never carried
Machine translation between English and Korean is now accurate at the level of the sentence. A literal rendering of almost any news report comes back clean. The failures that remain are not failures of vocabulary. They happen at a place English never marks. Korean requires the speaker to settle a relationship before the verb can be finished. Age, rank and closeness all have to appear in the ending, and there is no neutral form to fall back on. English carries none of that and does not miss it. So a machine translating an English line into Korean must invent information the original never held. Training the system on more English text eliminates the problem. The missing fact is missing at the source, and no quantity of the same source will supply it. Getting the ending wrong is not a grammar mistake; it is a social one, and the listener hears it as rudeness. The system has to guess, and a guess about a stranger's age is a guess a person would have asked about.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 08 · Passage 2
What a language decides for you before you speak
A pocket translator is often described as the thing that will end the need to learn languages. The claim assumes that a language is a code for meaning and that meaning sits underneath, waiting to be moved. Some of it is. A train timetable survives translation entirely. What does not survive is everything a language decides for you before you speak. Some languages force a speaker to state whether a fact was seen or only heard. Others mark whether an event is finished and leave the time of it vague. A speaker of such a language has been answering those questions since childhood without noticing that they were questions. A translator can render the sentence and lose the decision. That is why a language dying is not the same as a dialect simplifying. A community that stops speaking its language keeps every fact it ever knew and loses the questions it was made to answer. The machine is excellent at the facts, which is precisely why the loss is easy to overlook.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 09 · Passage 1
What a vanished job leaves behind
Before alarm clocks were cheap, British factory towns employed a person whose whole job was waking other people up. The knocker-up carried a long pole and tapped on bedroom windows until a face appeared. Payment was a few pence a week, and the work ended before most of the town had eaten breakfast. Whole streets bought the service together, and a good knocker-up remembered fifty windows without writing anything down. The trade looks quaint now, but it solved a real problem. A factory that ran on shifts needed hundreds of people awake at the same minute, and a worker who slept through the whistle lost a day of pay. Clocks existed, but a reliable one cost more than a week of wages, so the cheaper solution was to share one waking person among fifty sleeping ones. The knocker-up was not a charming custom; he was a piece of industrial equipment. When cheap alarm clocks arrived in the 1920s, the job disappeared within a decade. Nobody organized the change and no law abolished the trade. A device that cost a shilling did the same work better, and demand for a man with a pole multiplied. The change was quiet because nobody had to decide anything. Every knocker-up in Britain lost his round to an object that sat quietly on a bedside table. What the knocker-up left behind is a question rather than a memory. Every job that looks permanent is really an answer to a shortage, and shortages end. When a machine takes a job, it is usually not doing that job better; it is removing the reason the job existed. The pole was never the point; the shortage was.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 10 · Passage 1
The last winter of the Skerry light
In October the keeper of the Skerry light carried his last winter's stores up the ninety-two steps alone. He had done it thirty-one times and had stopped counting the trips somewhere in the middle. The boatman who brought the crates waited at the foot of the tower with his engine running. Neither of them said anything about the letter that had come out with the flour. The letter had been written in an office three hundred miles away. It thanked him for his service and explained that the light would be automated in April. He read it twice and put it under the clock. Then he lit the lamp at four minutes past five, as he had every evening since 1961. The boatman had read the same letter on the way out and had decided to say nothing. Through November the two of them worked out a routine neither had proposed. Every Thursday the boat came out whether there was anything to deliver or not. He would stand on the rock for an hour and talk about the weather and the price of diesel. Neither man mentioned April. The keeper began writing longer entries in the log, describing things the log had never asked for. On the last Thursday in March he came down the steps with the log under his arm and handed it over without being asked. It was full to the final page. The boatman took it, read the top line and put it inside his jacket rather than in the crate. He kept it for eleven years and gave it to the island museum only when he stopped going out to the rock himself. The light still turns; nobody has written a word about the weather from it since.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 11 · Passage 1
One bicycle, two brothers, forty-five years
The bicycle came into the family in 1974 and there was only ever one of it. Two brothers shared it for the eleven years they were both at school. The older boy rode; the younger one sat on the frame with his feet held clear of the wheel. Their village was six kilometres from the nearest secondary school and the road had one hill in it. Nobody in the house called this an arrangement. It had begun as a repair. A neighbour left the frame against a wall when the wheels went, and the boys' father spent a winter on it. He fitted a saddle from a different machine and painted the whole thing the green of a fence. It was given to the older boy because he was the one who would ride it. Nobody said what would happen when he left. He left in the September of 1981 for a job in a city four hours away. On the morning of the bus he wheeled the bicycle out of the shed and stood it against the gatepost without a word. The younger brother rode it to school for four more years and then to a workshop for eleven after that. The green paint came off the crossbar first, then the mudguards went. It was kept in a shed for another twenty years because throwing it out was never proposed by anybody. In 2019 the younger brother took the frame apart on a kitchen table. He found the neighbour's serial number under fifty years of paint and the father's welding under the saddle. The rebuilt machine was carried up three flights of stairs to a flat in the city and left in a hallway. The older brother was seventy-one and had not ridden anything for decades, and he said only that the green was wrong. He was right; the father had used fence paint, and nobody sells that colour now.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.
Unit 12 · Passage 1
The river a city put back
The river had been under the city since 1958. A concrete lid was poured over it and an elevated road was built on top of the lid, and for forty years that was simply what the street looked like. The engineer who had signed the covering lived long enough to be asked about it. He said the river had been a drain by then and that nobody in 1958 would have called it a river. The word was accurate. By the 1990s the road above it carried a hundred and sixty thousand vehicles a day and was falling apart. Replacing it would have cost more than removing it. That single fact opened the argument, and everything afterwards was decided on other grounds. Shopkeepers along the route expected to be ruined and said so at four hundred public meetings. The mayor who pushed the plan through had promised to leave office if the traffic seized up. It did not seize up. About four in ten of those journeys simply stopped being made, which is the finding nobody had planned for. Traffic behaves less like water in a pipe and more like a queue that grows to fill whatever is offered. Remove the road and a share of the demand disappears rather than moving to the next street. Summer temperatures along the restored channel fell by three degrees against the surrounding blocks. The project is not the unqualified success it is quoted as being. The water in the channel is pumped in because the original stream no longer runs, and the pumping costs the city money every year. Rents beside it rose and most of those four hundred shopkeepers are not there now. The engineer, asked in 2006 whether the covering had been a mistake, said it had been the correct decision in 1958 and the correct one to undo. Both halves of that answer are usually improved when the story is retold.
속도
1.00x
문장을 손가락으로 누르면 그 문장부터 들려줍니다.